On 2010-08-12, Lars Wirzenius <[email protected]> wrote: > * Various things are easier if debian/copyright can be parsed and > interpreted by software, rather than being free-form text. For > example, answering questions like "what stuff is GPLv2 only, > and therefore incompatible with GPLv3?".
This is quite useless as long as we are making copyright files for sourcefiles. source foo produces a library and some tools the files ending up in the library is lgplv2+ the files ending up in the tools (executables) are gplv2only and then a different gplv3+ app also uses libfoo. should this then be marked as a "problem" ? /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
