Hi, for those who are just marking mails in this thread as read... ;-)
On Donnerstag, 23. Dezember 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Using revision 135 of the DEP from svn.debian.org is a waste of time, for
> the people who would like to write a copyright file, or for the peopole who
> would like to write a parser. I strongly recommend against using it.
is there a revision not "being a waste of time"^w^w^w^w^wworth adapting by
now?
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
