Applied all three patches, thanks. On to, 2011-01-13 at 09:53 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 09:09:09PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius a écrit : > > > > I think I agree with your proposal to link to SPDX. Alternatively, we > > could collect the licenses as attachments to the spec, or point at the > > ones on the OSI site. I'd rather avoid attaching things, but otherwise > > I'm fine with anything. > > > > Charles, would you be willing to provide a patch to link to SPDX and fix > > the FreeBSD shortname issue? I seem to have shown myself to be a bit > > careless with this license thing, and I make sloppy edits (this is > > probably because I find this part to be the least interesting one, and > > one that I've dreaded for months). > > I just realised that the SPDX site is not yet ready as their license links > point to empty pages: http://spdx.org/licenses/ > > I attached three patches. The first removes the FreeBSD license, the second > adds missing links to upstream pages, and the last points all the links to > SPDX > instead. I think that we should wait before applying the third and use the > second in the meantime. > > In addition I noticed a minor mismatch between the SPDX license list page and > the SPDX license spreadsheet: in the first the Apache license is ‘ASL’, and in > the second it is ‘Apache’. The third patch may therefore need some adjustment, > depending on how SPDX resolves this. > > Have a nice day, >
-- Blog/wiki/website hosting with ikiwiki (free for free software): http://www.branchable.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
