Russ Allbery <[email protected]> writes: > But there are two other main reasons why I want an overall package > license: […]
Okay, I'm convinced there's a case for having an option of copyright and license that applies to the package as a whole, as distinct from applying to each individual source file. I agree with Russ that where we acknowledge copyright applies, we need to have explicit license; so if we allow “Copyright” field in the header, the “License” field needs to be present also (and, I suppose, vice versa). -- \ “… whoever claims any right that he is unwilling to accord to | `\ his fellow-men is dishonest and infamous.” —Robert G. | _o__) Ingersoll, _The Liberty of Man, Woman and Child_, 1877 | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
