merge [email protected] [email protected] thanks
> Should we identify ourselves as "foundation like" as Apache (for example)? +1 on relevance although not sure about 'foundation' > Debian Project is like a "multi-front" tech effort, stretching limits of > collective useful work and something a "working umbrella" for more sub > projects, > while delivering a "flagship product". Here we go -- Debian is a "flagship distribution" -- the mothership of the majority of other GNU/Linux distributions out there. Bending the realm that Debian is a foundation (and it is), and we have a "flagship product". Together with "foundation" they might become very catchy imho. > Should we enhance visibility of the sub-projects (debian-desktop needs you) > and > Pure Blends? +10 > Should we tell more about CUT and the Security Team and Release Team process > improvements that could allow 5 year stable support? yes > Should not we be proud of doing the things "right way" instead of > "share-holders-first way"? yes... although according to maddog describing freedom to mortals is much more difficult than describing the slavery, so we might like to start from the opposite end somehow ;) -- =------------------------------------------------------------------= Keep in touch www.onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
