"Alex (karl exceed) Decker" <[email protected]> writes:
> Just out of curiosity, I noticed that Debian has not been registered as > CGL compliant since the 2.0 standard. Is there any plan on working > toward CGL 5.0 compliance? > I understand that it's a bit above and beyond normal usage, but a proven > 5-nine uptime is something to brag about... This is the first time I've ever heard anyone even mention the existence of CGL, and I work professionally as a systems administrator for critical services (on Linux, even). Does anyone actually care about this specification? Often this sort of thing ends up being essentially a marketing tactic by the vendors involved in developing the specification rather than being something useful for improving technical quality. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
