Steve Langasek <[email protected]> writes: > - single header paragraph plus a single Files: * paragraph. In this case, > any License/Copyright fields in the header paragraph are used only to > document compilation copyright and whole-package license terms (e.g., the > effective license of a package whose individual files are dual-licensed > but only one of these licenses is compatible with the rest of the work; > or when a maintainer is choosing to sublicense or redistribute a package > under different terms than the obvious ones). This implies that the > maintainer must make the additional effort of working out what a correct > copyright notice is that covers "Files: *".
> I have no preference between these two, but I do think it's important to > pick one so that the semantics are consistent. > Given the current language and the feedback in this thread, I think > there is a general preference for the second option. Russ, does this > meet your needs? Yup. That option seems fine to me. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
