Le Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 01:06:25PM +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit :
> 
> I am convinced that even CC-by-v3.0 and CC-by-sa-v3.0 licenses *fail* to
> meet the DFSG).

By the way, is it recorded somewhere, what are the exact changes that made v3.0
acceptable, while v2.5 was not ?

Have a nice day,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]

Reply via email to