Uoti Urpala <[email protected]> > [...] A meaningful trademark license cannot permit everything > permitted under the DFSG; at some point you do have to rebrand the > software and remove use of trademarks to be allowed to further > exercise DFSG freedoms (a limitation allowed by DFSG 4).
Hi! This looks like the unproven step. Why can't it? I could have sworn I'd seen at least one: OpenJDK or something like that - was it not meaningful in your opinion, has the law changed since, or something else? > [...] Try to understand what the actual issues here are, and then > read through the thread again. Careful! No good lies in suggesting people who disagree with you are stupid (cannot understand) or careless (did not read), especially when many readers of debian-project have understood their arguments more often than yours in the past, even if we disagreed. It may be possible to understand the issues, read the thread and still disagree about the conclusions. Regards, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
