Paul Tagliamonte writes ("Re: ditching the official use logo?"):
> I know this is a borderline slimy argument, and I really (REALLY) don't
> like being on the side of non-free, but I think continuing to assert
> copyright / non-free conditions on the official use logo won't really
> cause much more harm.Yes. I quite agree. I think it is entirely right and proper for the Debian Project to have some logos, names, etc., which represent _approval by the project_. Obviously such logos cannot possibly serve their purpose and be Free. Software Freedom includes the freedom to do things without our approval. But I don't think there is any contradiction here with our principles, provided that we make sure that the software we ship does not use non-free logos. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
