Sune Vuorela <nospam <at> vuorela.dk> writes: > What's the problem here ?
It’s a trust question. If something differs, people wonder why. If something broke in the past, people are more wary. The answer showed that there’s nothing to worry except for the maintainer address merge failure, though (this is why I asked, it could have been worse). > > ??? In addition to that, this time, > > ??? it???s got an Original-Maintainer field > > ??? ???Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss <at> lists.ubuntu.com>??? > > ??? excuse me, what? > > Maybe ubuntu maintains it? That would look different: no Original-Maintainer field, and a non-bouncing address too. This *really* looked like a fsckup to me, which is why I took it on me to actually ask (rather than wonder) about it. bye, //mirabilos -- Sometimes they [people] care too much: pretty printers [and syntax highligh- ting, d.A.] mechanically produce pretty output that accentuates irrelevant detail in the program, which is as sensible as putting all the prepositions in English text in bold font. -- Rob Pike in "Notes on Programming in C" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
