On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 08:17:48AM -0700, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > Now. If you have a 2048 bit or larger key that has been signed by at > least 2 other DDs but still have a 1024D key in our keyring you should > be filing a request for replacement.
I'm sorry, I realize only now I wasn't clear on this point. I was talking about the WoT at large, not only the Debian keyring. I've indeed replaced my 1024D key wih my 4096R key in the Debian keyring a long time ago. What I haven't yet done is _revoking_ the old key. Doing that now should have no bad effect on the Debian keyring, as any potentially "bad" effect there has already happened when I did the replacement. > The more useful question is how many of the signatures on your new key > come from strong keys, and how many strong keys have you signed with > that new key? Right. If you happen to have a oneliner to verify that I'll be happy to answer these questions :) Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . z...@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club » -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131005153218.ga3...@upsilon.cc