Jonathan Dowland <[email protected]> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 01:37:36PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Ah, I hadn't ever thought about it from that angle. Basically, the
>> argument is that if there's no original creative addition, it can't be
>> a derivative work? On first glance, 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 appears to support
>> that:
> Eek. What about (hypothetical) derivative works which do not add
> anything, but take things away? ("this option just confuses our users")
Selection of what to take away can be a creative addition in the sense
that I meant it, so addition was probably the wrong word.
--
Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
