Thorsten Glaser <[email protected]> schrieb: > Moritz Mühlenhoff <jmm <at> inutil.org> writes: > >> Kurt Roeckx <kurt <at> roeckx.be> schrieb: > >> > The rules seem to suggest that we need a priority important bug > > So, if I have one, I can include the relevant bugfix? > >> > So I have the impression that if upstream has a stable branch and >> > really only do bug fixes with a low chance of regressions that >> > this will most likely be accepted. >> >> Yes. For some cases (e.g. postgres and openjdk) the upstream QA made >> for the bugfix releases exceeds the possible Debian QA for a >> backported fix by far. > > OK, in this case: I would like to prepare updates for mediawiki and > mediawiki-extensions for stable, to fix security issues (in mediawiki), > RC bugs (affecting both), and a severity:important bug with a one-line fix. > > Where do I send the diffs for prior review to? And where do I upload to > (stable-proposed-updates?)?
You're referring to shipping the mediawiki 1.19.x branch for stable security updates? That sounds like a probable candidate from a quick glance. Please send a mail to [email protected], not everyone reads debian-project Cheers, Moritz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
