On 17/01/14 at 12:47 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > So, first things first, I would welcome your feedback on the TO > > criterias[1]. Soft deadline: 2014-02-01. > > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DPL/TrustedOrganizationCriteria > > I didn't find anything really problematic in the criteria, at least not > wrt Debian France. Let me still add some comments. > > > == The organization should share Debian's general visions == > > > > The organization's activities and political stance should generally > > match Debian's own political and philosophical stances. > > "activities" might be a bit broad. TO might have (Debian-related) > activities that Debian is (purposedly) not doing, and this should > not be a blocker IMO. > > IMO we should simply tell that the TO bylaws, activities and > political stance should not be in conflict with Debian's > social contract.
OK, "not conflict" is indeed a better wording. [ Your other comments are specific to Debian France -- let's not address them now, but rather when we will discuss Debian France ] Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
