On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Lucas Nussbaum <[email protected]> wrote:
> So I'm not against considering the idea of keep the DC15 TO after DC15, > but this will clearly have to be weighted against the disadvantages of > this option. We decided to go with a single-use eV for DebConf15, because: * of the valid points aba raised wrt taxes * of the discussion about the name and concerns from various parties * we value moving quickly and without (too much) resistance over a mere name Please note that the by-laws may not reflect this directly for legal reasons. Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CAD77+gS7aUUSS-0G=XTOji07Stxne7mA7VVNBZXqY=6rz6r...@mail.gmail.com
