Daniel Pocock <daniel <at> pocock.pro> writes: > Literally, "open source" implies you can see the source. I personally
The correct term for *that* is “shared source”, though. “Open Source” means that it’s got an OSD-conformant licence plus that you actually get the source code under that licence. “OSI certified Open Source Software™” means the same plus that the licence is not just OSD-conformant but that that fact has been decided on by the relevant OSI board, and is a trademark, which just “Open Source” isn’t, as it’s too generic for becoming a trademark. In the Debian context, “DFSG-free” is the relevant term to use. bye, //mirabilos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
