ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:

> > The wiki page says that the TO status will be closed after DebConf18.
> > I wonder if it would be better to keep the TO status
> * Maybe. But I think we can change it before it is expired, right?

Having post-DebConf plans for were specifically requested by

I don't have any strong opinion about what happens to it but as Chen
implies, having a closed loop (ie. plan to close it and change one's
mind later) seems to be a sensible fallback as it prevents issues around
"zombie" TOs lying around.


     : :'  :     Chris Lamb
     `. `'` /

Reply via email to