On Tue, 2018-07-03 at 23:19 +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > Yet, this isn't one, as I've long given up on expecting that upgrade path to > be fixed - I've reverted to arguing simply that if there's a piece of > functionality (Unix extensions) in the software, the documentation for the > software should mention its basic characteristics, esp. those that have been > known to cause annoying behavior in practice. > > It would be akin to having the Apache documentation describe its HTTPS > support with two sentences in a manual, and have nothing else whatsoever > (yet it ships e.g. /etc/apache2/mods-available/ssl.conf with a fair bit > of info, and there's other docs too).
Please take this upstream, with a patch. This isn't the forum, and won't achieve your aims. Sorry, Andrew Bartlett -- Andrew Bartlett https://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team https://samba.org Samba Development and Support, Catalyst IT https://catalyst.net.nz/services/samba
