Eldon Koyle <[email protected]> writes: > Is there some kind of software that could help people break down their > claims into fundamental parts, then get feedback on the parts > individually, maybe even refining their viewpoint as the discussion > evolves?
Prior to considering technical solutions: Have you got any examples of real dispersed communities that are able to avoid the problems you you described? Regardless of technology, I'm not aware of any forums that achieve the kind of formal structure you're talking about, because humans who need to have representative participation tend to be discouraged by greater formal or technical barriers. So what real-world examples would you point to as a counter to that tendency, and how do you think technology helps achieve that improvement in those real-world cases? -- \ “Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without | `\ having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it | _o__) too?” —Douglas Adams | Ben Finney
