On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 08:27:33PM +0200, Ansgar wrote: >On Mon, 2021-07-26 at 16:56 +0200, Jonathan Carter wrote: > >> For official media, it would go against #1 of the SC and (depending >> on the exact firmware) at least #2 and #3 of the DGSG. > >Including files for optional use does not imply that non-free >components are required, so it doesn't violate SC #1: We already >include non-free packages in the archive. Surely taking the archive and >putting it on a BluRay doesn't turn the free system available from the >archive into a non-free system that requires use of non-free >components. > >Obviously packages in non-free don't need to comply with the DFSG, no >matter whether including in the archive or on BluRay images.
Can we please stop exploring this rabbit hole until after the bullseye release? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com < liw> everything I know about UK hotels I learned from "Fawlty Towers"