On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 15:07:38 +0100, Dominik George wrote:
I think you are confusing ownership with responsibility. "Ownership" would mean that I don't want others to touch my package. That does, as you said, not make sense in team maintenance. "Responsibility", or "being in charge", means that someone pledged to take on maintainer responsibilities, like keeping the package updated regularly, ensuring it transitions to testing, etc. – i.e., regular tasks that do not arise from external communication.Huh? What's the point of having team-maintained packages at all with that perspective? Maybe it helps to think about this differently, and consider that it is possible to not have a single-maintainer strong ownership model of package maintainance.
Simon and you are describing the two different models of "team maintenance" in Debian. That's what we have, and none of them are right/wrong, and there's IMO no use in arguing "teams means foo" or "teams mean bar".
Maybe it's a bit unfortunate that we use the same term for different concepts, but yeah, that's what it is :)
Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe`-
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
