Some general advice on this would be nice, although I think it is challenging to argue this is a clear violation of the DSC. Hard retoric on a topic like this is great nerd bait.
One could argue that end users will benefit if the GNOME Foundation is adequately funded, and if more people are made aware of that. Is the main concern that this is about asking for monetary donation? Or is the main concern that it shows a "nag" screen reminding the user about some philosophical or project-specific matter, which may or may not be about a donation? Or is only the combination of those two a problem? This seems more complex than it looks on the surface. Maybe we could develop a position statement with recommendations for package maintainers how to go about reasoning about this topic? I don't see how any hard policy or ruling on this could even be phrased. We could give general recommendations and suggestions, but leave things up to each maintainer. I've seen a couple of packages (cannot recall which now, riseup-vpn may have been one) with similar issues, but I never thought a lot about it even though my initial reaction was dislike. To take a more extreme example, let's say systemd wouldn't start before you finished watching a 1 minute video feed saying that you should buy a Microsoft 365 subscription. Patching that "feature" out may be permitted by the license. Should Debian do that? Do we have any policy that REQUIRES us to do that? What would we do if Microsoft said they would no longer sign the UEFI shim loader if we patch out the commercial? /Simon Nilesh Patra <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > > [ CCing a few relevant folks for my question ] > > Reading this bug report made me realize, it is kind of similar for > riseup-vpn package. > That displays a MOTD with a "please donate if you can" banner > everytime one runs the app. > > I've never got bug reports for it yet. Is that an actual problem? I'd > feel really bad > to remove it, and personally would not want to do it. > > I'm looking for advice here. > > Thanks! > > On 12/05/26 2:35 am, [email protected] wrote: >> To: [email protected] >> Package: tech-ctte >> Severity: serious >> Followup-For: Bug #1135385 >> X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected], >> [email protected] >> >> I request the Debian Technical Committee intervene regarding Bug >> #1135385, concerning the default-enabled donation notification in >> gnome-control-center, currently dismissed as a duplicate of Bug >> #1120511. >> >> The maintainer, Jeremy Bícha, has declined to address the core issue, >> that a default-enabled fundraising notification violates Debian Social >> Contract Clause 4: "We will be guided by the needs of our users and >> free software community. We will place their interests first." >> >> This feature imposes an external agenda (GNOME Foundation fundraising) >> without user consent, undermining user autonomy and Debian’s ethical >> foundation. It is not a minor usability concern, but a policy and >> philosophical violation, analogous to Bug #964359 (SMPlayer donation >> nag), which was patched out due to reputational risk. >> >> The maintainer’s responses (closing as duplicate, telling users to >> run commands to disable the notification, etc), fails to engage with >> the ethical and policy dimensions. This constitutes a willful >> disregard of Debian’s stewardship principles. The issue leaves no >> remaining ambiguity and is a direct conflict between upstream agendas >> and Debian’s values. >> >> Per Debian Constitution §6.1.4, I ask the TC to: >> Overrule the maintainer’s decision to dismiss Bug #1135385 and >> to discontinue ignoring Bug #1120511. >> Require that the donation notification be either: >> Patched out of the Debian package, or >> Disabled by default with a clear, informed opt-in mechanism. >> Clarify that maintainers must consider Debian Social Contract >> violations as actionable, especially when upstream decisions conflict >> with user interests. >> Consider whether the maintainer’s continued refusal to address a >> documented policy violation constitutes an unambiguous failure of >> stewardship. >> >> References: >> Bug #1135385: https://bugs.debian.org/1135385 >> Bug #1120511: https://bugs.debian.org/1120511 >> Bug #964359 (SMPlayer): https://bugs.debian.org/964359 > >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
