Holger Levsen wrote: > Also, this developer is on the lowNMU list, so maybe NMUing the package and removing the links pointing to that homepage could be a first, hopefully rather non-controversial step.
And what would you do when the maintainer reverts the NMU? > I wonder if there is a better way to deal with this than reassigning #1024493 to the tech-ctte? (Looping in the community team would be my other idea.) tech-ctte rules on *technical* issues, so this doesn't really seem within their mandate. And the community team has no powers on the contents of packages. The DPL might be able to act under 5.1.4, but I'd consider highly dubious that overriding the person responsible for something is a legitimate "decision for whom no one else has responsibility". If 5.1.4 can't be invoked, I suppose there's no other way short of a GR. In fact, I'm not sure that even a GR can overrule a maintainer on a nontechnical issue (4.1.5 is only about "policy documents and statements"). Gerardo
