Joerg Jaspert [21/Jul 12:13am +02] wrote: > But the most interesting part in my first read of it is this: > >> This monthly report was an example not an exception for this Freexian >> contributor, and a point could be made that a DD who is defrauding >> Debian LTS is defrauding Debian and should therefore be expelled >> from Debian. > > First, we do have a process around somewhere, if one DD thinks another > should be out of the project. Not used often, thankfully, but existing. > > Second, while the above is written without names, it shouldn't be hard > for people involved to find out who is meant. Something like slander, > defamation or similar could get lawyers involved. Doesn't sound like a > way to take. Please be careful what you write on our public lists.
Right. Adrian, it was irresponsible of you to post this to a public list. If you thought it was very important to include it (and I'm not convinced it was), you could have sent it as a reply but addressed only to debian-private@. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
