On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Marc Dequènes wrote: > > - Perhaps in keeping with the style of cdbs, it would be better to have > > two classes python-pycentral and python-pysupport (and some > > python-common or python-core) behind it? This would also avoid the > > tacky use of -ng in the class name. :-) > > buxy replied to this. I would add by having a method selector we can in > the end remove the obsoleted method when this comes, as nothing else > (from a user point of view) is method-specific.
Agreed. > > - DEB_PYTHON_MODULE_PACKAGE should perhaps default to the package that > > matches python-* in addition to the other criteria? > > As python package don't have to match python-* in all cases (apps > don't), i conclude this is wrong in such cases, and superflous in other > ones. With no comment from people on IRC when i asked, i decided to > leave this untouched. Can most python applications be installed with distutils? (i.e. I'm not sure that the class is going to be really used for python applications) > In needed_tools/ you'll find the corresponding cdbs package i intend to > upload if you have no objection (or you may upload it yourself if you > prefer). You have right problems on the source package (403 forbidden). I would love to have this upload to happen today before dinstall (19:00 UTC) as we have many python packages relying on CDBS in the team. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]