Le jeudi 29 juin 2006 à 22:09 +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit : > Hi all, > > I'm currently working on getting libxml2 (and later libxslt) to the new > policy, and actually noticed something interesting: > -rw-r--r-- root/root 273888 2006-06-29 22:02 > ./usr/lib/python-support/python-libxml2/python2.3/libxml2mod.so > -rw-r--r-- root/root 273888 2006-06-29 22:02 > ./usr/lib/python-support/python-libxml2/python2.4/libxml2mod.so > > Same size AND same content. > > After some discussions on #debian-python, I added stuff in debian/rules > so that if the binary extensions are identical, I'd replace the dup with > a symbolic link. I'm still building for all versions as suggested on > #d-p in case the python includes change in some ways. > > Don't you think it'd be nice to add support to python-support and > python-central for that case ?
Python-support already checks the md5sums of the files to install, but it excludes the .so because files are moved to /usr/share and it would violate the FHS. I also thought this would never happen. I can add the handling of this case by putting them e.g. in /usr/lib/python-support/python-foo/all/. -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
