"Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At the moment, it's set to me, but it seems to me it's better for > everybody, if it is rather set to DPMT, since that way everyone > should feel encouraged to fix things in all DPMT packages.
The bug reports are available, for those looking for things to fix. > On the other hand, if the maintainer is set to me directly, then > it's more clear, who is responsible for the package. This is certainly my preference. It's much clearer if there is *one* person named as the responsible party for the packages. It's a fact of human psychology that if a collective group is named as the responsible party, then nobody in that group feels particularly responsible. This is one reason why groups nominate a leader: it gives that person a stake in seeing the group's efforts succeed. None of this means that the responsible person is the *only* one responsible, of course. -- \ "Science doesn’t work by vote and it doesn’t work by | `\ authority." —Richard Dawkins, Big Mistake (The Guardian) | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
