Steve M. Robbins wrote:
Hi,
Thanks to Steve, Bernd, and Josselin for ideas.
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 09:17:24PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Decorate only the shared library names with the python versions, and retain
the current names for the .a files and .so symlinks - with two separate -dev
packages that conflict with one another?
That still prevents anyone from packaging an extension that builds for both
python2.4 and python2.5 at once using Boost.Python, but I think it solves
all the other drawbacks of the other solutions you suggested.
Indeed. Do you think this is a serious restriction? Given that
Debian likes to package extensions for all python versions, I tend to
think it will become a problem.
extensions for different python installations don't conflict because
they end up in separate directories. Python's own runtime library does a
similar thing: it is installed in <prefix>/lib/python<version>/config.
What if boost.python gets installed into that directory, too ? Wouldn't
this solve the issue ?
Regards,
Stefan
--
...ich hab' noch einen Koffer in Berlin...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
