On Tue, Dec 23, 2008, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I'll argue we want something different.  We want VCS that will
> maximize participation.  That means both keeping top contributors
> happpy and keeping it accessible to newcomers.
> 
> I don't think hg, bzr, or git obviously qualify as accesible.  My
> vote, fwiw, is to stay with svn until we have a documented, accessible
> workflow with tool support.

 Fair point.

-- 
Loïc Minier


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to