Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@ubuntu.com> writes: > Jakub Wilk escribió: > > What is the correct umbrella to package a plugin for a Python > > application under? DPMT or PAPT? > > PAPT, since it's not a module
Hmm? I can't see a reasonable way to package a Python application plug-in that *isn't* a module (or a Python “package”, which is essentially a library of modules). It would make more sense, in my view, to say that an application plug-in isn't an application, so it doesn't fit PAPT. -- \ “Holy uncanny photographic mental processes, Batman!” —Robin | `\ | _o__) | Ben Finney
pgpqgTMVQNYt5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
