Matthias Klose wrote: > On 28.01.2010 12:50, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Scott Kitterman<deb...@kitterman.com> (17/12/2009): >>> I believe that we are getting close to uploading Python 2.6 to >>> Unstable and dropping Python 2.4 as a supported Python version. If >>> we finish preparations in the next week, are there any ongoing >>> transitions a python2.6/python- defaults upload would entangle that >>> would cause the release team to want the uploads to be delayed? >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm not sure it's the proper thread to mention this, but from a quick >> look, it sounds like related. >> >> FWIW, here are some FTBFSes I've reported lately, which look due to >> this transition: >> #567226: pysvn > > that's a wrong report, pycxx needs binNMUed, then the package does build.
pycxx is an Architecture: all package and cannot be binNMUed as such, so a sourceful upload is required. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
