Hi, On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:05:56AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > If there is a valid, technical reason, please let us know, but as of > now I can't see any.
Loads of RC bugfixes (partly on obsolete versions) waiting to enter testing which would more blocked that it already is with the mips* buildd backlog. > So, let's just change the default to 2.6, kindly ask Lucas to do an > archive-wide rebuild (I'm pretty sure he'll be happy to support us, > but not certan, hey we still have to ask him ;) ), and deal with the > fallback. For months. At which time we'll still have the completely obsolete OOo 3.1.1 (or whatever else example you find) in squeeze. No. > Keep waiting and waiting is pointless, and does only harm for the > target to support a stable release (there are very few people actively That's true, though. But python's not alone in the world and if you did it far earlier.... Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70 `- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100217144957.ga16...@rene-engelhard.de
