"Lino Mastrodomenico" <l.mastrodomen...@gmail.com> wrote:

>2010/5/26 Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com>:
>> This would mean separate python-foo and python3-foo binaries where both are
>> supported from the same source.
>
>What will happen in the not-so-close future when Python 2.x is no
>longer supported? All the python3-foo binary packages will be renamed
>python-foo?
>

If /usr/bin/python ever points to a python3 version that would be appropriate. 
That may never happen (even after python2 is no longer in the archive, I think 
it prudent to consider users still using then ancient python2 code from private 
repositories).  If it does,  I think it's many release cycles away and not 
something we should worry about now.  Reusing namespace for an incompatible 
purpose because it looks nice isn't something I'm in favor of anyway. 

Scott K


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/48c06820-4945-4d9a-aa7e-62da055c7...@email.android.com

Reply via email to