[Sandro Tosi, 2011-05-16] > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 16:43, Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> wrote: > > I think it's deeply unfortunate that the pkgme authors chose duplicate > > something for which there is already a reasonably complete solution rather > > than focus on areas where that was not the case or improving the existing > > solution. > > ehm, isn't this exactly the python-support/dh_python2 critics?
we both know I'd not write dh_python2 if I could fix dh_pysupport (not even mentioning PEP8... problems). It's a different design and I agree that nobody would accept dh_python2 few years ago (with few new 2.X transitions ahead) -- Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc www.debian.org GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110516151458.gu17...@piotro.eu
