On 01/22/2014 07:39 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 22.01.2014 08:28, schrieb Thomas Goirand: >> On 01/22/2014 12:24 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: >>> Do you really think that it's unfeasible for git proponents on this team to >>> find the necessary resources to plan an orderly en mass transition? It >>> might >>> indeed be so, we're all busy. But let's hopefully all agree that the end >>> goal >>> is to have all team-maintained packages in the same vcs. >> >> I can't answer this question, as I can't speak for the others, and I >> don't have time myself. > > sure, so you are proposing something which you don't want to finish, just > pursuing a rather selfish interest of using git yourself. You did try this > with > the debian-java team as well.
I don't think so. I don't maintain any Java package. >> Well, if we decide to move slowly things to Git, then the packages that >> will stay in the SVN repo will be those largely unmaintained... > > and these will be magically maintained when converted to Git? I guess, not more than with SVN... > please don't be silly. I don't think I have. You are making wrong assumptions here, I believe. > unmaintained packages are not a property of the used VCS. Agreed!!! > And you said > you don't have time to spend on these yourself. > >> http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=openstack-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org >> >> The only reason they are maintained within the OpenStack team is because >> I don't want to be forced to use SVN, and I think it's safer than in >> collab-maint where so many people have commit access (which means they >> can rm -rf...). > > apparently these were first needed for openstack. so it seems to make sense to > maintain these over there. That's truth only for a subset of them, not all of them. Many are of general purpose. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52dfca83.7020...@debian.org
