Hey all, Simon McVittie [2014-09-05 16:05 +0100]: > >> It might also be worth noting that the systemd maintainers switched from > >> git-dpm to gbp-pq recently (between 204 and 208, I think), so they > >> obviously didn't think git-dpm was the better option.
I don't think anyone in pkg-systemd@ has looked at git-dpm yet. In fact we switched from gitpkg to standard git-buildpackage. gbp-pq is a local development tool which greatly eases patch handling especially for new upstream versions, but as that's not exposed in the official git, but is only a glorified way of maintaining the debian/patches quilt series locally that shouldn't affect other workflows. gitpkg is rather complicated to use and set up, only about 3 people in Debian know how it works properly, and it makes it really hard to track a set of changes against trunk over time (i. e. the equivalent of a quilt series, or stacked git). So I'm not sure where "switched from git-dpm" came from? Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140905151824.gh3...@piware.de
