On 04/13/2015 11:07 PM, Donald Stufft wrote: > >> On Apr 13, 2015, at 4:17 PM, Stefano Rivera <stefa...@debian.org> wrote: >> >> Matthias and I are planning to have a Debian Python BoF at PyCon, >> tomorrow afternoon. I think lunch is 2pm, so 3pm? >> >> Meet outside the cPython sprint room? >> >> Matthias wants to discuss general stretch goals for Python in Debian. >> I want to make concrete plans for py3k packages that are compatible with >> multiple interpreters. >> >> > > Does this mean PyPy too? It’d be great to have a (not just specific to Debian) > standard for how to mark a binary for a particular Python that gracefully > handles > other interpreters too. Right now we have the de facto standard of binary, > binaryX, > and binaryX.Y but that really only sanely handles CPython.
can we do that in a separate session? I'm not keen on introducing another hierarchy like /usr/lib/pypy2/dist-packages, and a hierarchy of pypy-* and pypy3-* packages. This is an issue for dependency tracking (for Debian packages), and multiarch able packages. I feel that deserves some more preparation, and time. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/552c3eb1.20...@debian.org
