On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 17:08:35 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > [Barry Warsaw, 2015-08-06] > > Should there be a naming convention for Python packages which only provide > > an > > executable? > > everything that doesn't match python[\d.]*- is fine IMHO. > > If "tox" is too generic, use tox-python
If "tox" is too generic, then that would also apply to "/usr/bin/tox" IMO. (Collisions over command names are even worse than collision over package names, since they have way more impact on users.) Cheers, Julien -- Julien Cristau <[email protected]> Logilab http://www.logilab.fr/ Informatique scientifique & gestion de connaissances -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
