On Oct 10, 2015, at 09:13 AM, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >Yes, except for the naming of branches where I would prefer to keep the >DEP-14 naming scheme (we should just rename debian/sid into debian/master). > >http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep14/ > >And I would suggest that we generalize the DEP-14 naming scheme as part of >our git packaging policy...
I'm all for standardization, but I do like the shorter names for the common case where you only need the unstable version. Certainly if there are vendor or series differences, the namespaces make a lot of sense. But most of my packages don't need it. Would you be open to allowing such simplification in the common case in DEP-14? Cheers, -Barry
