Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> writes: > /usr/bin/python3 being Python 4.x is a bit weird though
Seriously? Who is proposing that? > and it’s likely that Python 4.x is not going to be another break the > world release. Certainly the command ‘python3’ should only ever point to the Python 3 interpreter. If upstream ever releases a “Python 4” but expects the interpreter for that to also be named ‘python3’, I think we can declare upstream to be directly courting user pain, and secede on behalf of our users. -- \ “[It's] best to confuse only one issue at a time.” —Brian W. | `\ Kernighan, Dennis M. Ritchie, _The C programming language_, 1988 | _o__) | Ben Finney