On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 18:58 -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 5:40 PM, Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 16:51 -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Ghislain Vaillant <ghisv...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > Now that new packages are targeting the Buster cycle, and that Python 2 > > > > packages should no longer be built, > > > > > > this is news to me, can you point me to where this was announced? > > > > Announced, I don't know. But: > > > > https://lintian.debian.org/tags/new-package-should-not-package-python2-module.html > > > > Unless I am missing something? > > this was triggered by > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=829744 -- sigh
Thanks for finding it out. So based on #829744, both pytest-qt and pytest-xvfb, which are new packages, do not produce a corresponding Python 2 binary package. Back to the original question, what about the naming for -doc packages? Ghis