On Thursday, February 16, 2017 12:42:59 PM Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On 16 February 2017 at 11:31, Piotr O┼╝arowski <pi...@debian.org> wrote:
> > Are you guys seriously considering dgit to replace anything other than
> > dput in DPMT? I'd rather go back to svn-buildpackage than use something
> > that will not allow me (f.e. as sponsor) to review before uploading!
> One can totally review before uploading with dgit.
> dgit takes ownership/syncing of your dgit/* heads.
> One can totally push master; review it; fix it up; push more; and then
> as a sponsor if you are happy to publish master one invokes dgit push
> to update the dgit/* branches & execute dput with a source matching
> the git tree.
> Is this the workflow you want?
> dgit doesn't impose anything what one does with master branch, or any
> other branch names you want.

Which is completely separate from the question of if we want to use it as a 
team.  Whoever it was that suggested focusing on what (if anything) to replace 
git-dpm with (post-stretch) and leave the dgit discussion for later, I 
completely agree with.

Scott K

Reply via email to