On 04/06/2017 09:36 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 04/06/2017 08:39 PM, Ondrej Novy wrote: >> And auto -dbgsym doesn't support python-dbg. So it's wrong for Python C >> modules. > > I guess I need to read more about this then. > > On 04/06/2017 06:31 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: >> In my opinion a better solution (for Stretch) would be just adding an >> Architecture: field to the -dbg packages (and for Buster, porting the >> code to support big endian architectures). > > This looks like the most reasonable solution to me. Thoughts anyone?
Does anyone oppose to an upload with this change? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)