> >My personal intepretation is that since this package is not used as > >python library this should be "fontmake" single package, but we need > >someone from Python Teams to confirm that. > > I think that makes sense. > > You have to make a judgement call about the primary purpose of the > package. If it's primarily an application and any python modules in > the package are only for use of the application, then sticking with > the upstream name is a sensible choice.
please also remember to install this private library into private (as in: outside dist-packages) dir. You can do that with something like: override_dh_auto_install: dh_auto_install -- --install-args=--install-lib=/usr/share/fontmake/ mv debian/fontmake/usr/bin/fontmake debian/fontmake/usr/share/fontmake/run dh_link /usr/share/fontmake/run /usr/bin/fontmake -- GPG: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645