[Matthias Klose, 2018-03-27] > On 26.03.2018 19:32, Piotr Ożarowski wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Here's a list of packages that will FTBFS soon if dh-python will not be > > added to Build-Depends (it's time to drop dh-python from python3's > > Depends and old version of dh_python2 from python package). > > > > http://people.debian.org/~piotr/dh_python3_without_dh-python.list > > http://people.debian.org/~piotr/dh_python3_without_dh-python.ddlist > > http://people.debian.org/~piotr/dh_python2_without_dh-python.list > > http://people.debian.org/~piotr/dh_python2_without_dh-python.ddlist > > > > The plan is to report bugs first and follow up with changes in -defaults > > packages in April or May. > > These lists have way to many false positives. So please, don't file bug > reports > before checking these manually.
can you name some so that I can try to figure out what went wrong? > You have to exclude all these source packages using python/python3 as a b-d > only > and which don't build any binary packages without any python/python3 > dependency > in the packages, e.g. gcc-defaults. gcc-defaults is not a false positive, it calls `dh_python2 -plibgcj-common` but doesn't depend on dh-python -- GPG: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645