Hi, I realised that upstream of tifffile[1] switched to Python3. When inspecting the package I somehow think that its main purpose is rather a user application than a Python module and thus I would rather rename the binary from python-tifffile to tifffile than python3-tifffile. What do you think?
As per [2] I added dh-python to the Build-Depends but it seems I would need python-minimal in addition to get /usr/bin/pyversions. For me it is a bit strange to realise that this basic functionality is not provided by dh-python "Depends: python-minimal". Am I missing something? It also seems that a Build-Depends: python3-distutils and if I add it it tries to do "python setup.py clean -a" which is stupid since there is no setup.py (and also no python but only python3). I wonder whether I'm missing something here as well in this very simple package which does not seem to work well with dh-python. BTW, I'd be *really* happy if somebody from Python team would take over this package into Python packaging team. I just adopted it from a former Debian Med team member but it is not Debian Med specific at all and I have no real interest in this package. Kind regards Andreas. PS: Please CC me, I'm not subscribed to this list. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/tifffile [2] https://people.debian.org/~piotr/dh_python2_without_dh-python.ddlist -- http://fam-tille.de