On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 9:54 PM Drew Parsons <dpars...@debian.org> wrote: > Yes, your script counts the dependencies along one direction (rdeps), > identifying which packages are ready to be de-python2-ised next. > > I'm talking about dependencies in the opposite direction, deps not > rdeps. Upstream vs downstream. > > My question is, of the 844 packages now currently on rdeps=0 and ready > for processing, which one should be processed first? Which one will > free up the largest number of upstream packages? Which one gives the > biggest bang for buck?
gothca, i hope. I've added the number of forward dependencies in the last update to the webpage; it's not super-accurate (f.e. python dep is counted twice, due to the nature of how it's produced, > 2.7 < 2.8) but it should give a general idea of what you asked for -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi