that policy is well written down, at https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/PythonModulesTeam/HowToJoin - give it a look and see if it clarifies your doubt about team maintenance and why someone would prefer to have the ultimate responsibility for the quality of a package.
you already created the openstack team (which is great!) with exactly and only the rules you like, where you're free to do what you feel is best; that's great but please also realize not everyone shares the same ideas as yours and you should try sometimes to respect those people decisions too. On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 6:14 PM Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 11/11/19 9:17 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Personally, I've been judicious in putting myself as Maintainer in DPMT and > > PAPT packages. If we were to ditch the current policy, my immediate > > response would be to remove DPMT/PAPT from uploaders and maintain them > > outside the team. It's about 1/4 of my DPMT/PAPT packages. > > > > I suspect I'm not the only one. > > > > Your proposal is not cost free for the teams. > > > > Scott K > > Hi Scott, > > Exactly what difference would it make? Just that your package would > really appear as not team-maintained, which is already the current plain > reality (as the "unwritten policy" tells nobody else but you can touch > the package). So I don't see why anyone in the team would mind. > > Cheers, > > Thomas Goirand (zigo) > -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://sandrotosi.me/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi Twitter: https://twitter.com/sandrotosi
