On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 08:30:42PM +0100, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 11:41:56PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > [...]
> > > 
> > > I got all of the triplets working, but was then stymied when I tried
> > > to specify Multi-Arch: same in the control file.  I got a lintian
> > > warning: multi-arch-same-package-calls-pycompile
> > > It seems that since the pybuild system (via dh_python3) adds a
> > > py3compile command to the postinst of the package, then I can't safely
> > > use Multi-Arch: same.
> > > 
> > > I don't know if this is the case for all python3 Arch: any packages
> > > with compiled extensions;
> > I think the tag desciption has a good step-by-step explanation why does
> > the tag exists.
> > But your package is not a "package with compiled extensions", is it?
> 
> Yes, it's got compiled extensions (Cython) in addition to this
> non-Python .so library file.
> 
> > > are they all effectively Multi-Arch: no?  Is this worth thinking about
> > > in the longer term?
> > What do you propose?
> 
> I think the fix to bug #812228 might have done the job nicely ;-)
If it actually ships extensions, the "it should usually get a dependency
on the Python interpreter for the same architecture" part should still
apply as far as I understand it.

-- 
WBR, wRAR

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to